Family of soldier who was harassed and killed at Fort Hood files claim against Army – For the Military – Khawam Ripka LLP
BREAKING NEWS: You can now file a claim for sexual assault while on active duty in the military, as per the recent 9th Circuit Court decision. Call us today for your free consultation!
BREAKING NEWS: You can now file a claim for sexual assault while on active duty in the military, as per the recent 9th Circuit Court decision. Call us today for your free consultation!

Family of soldier who was harassed and killed at Fort Hood files claim against Army

Family of Vanessa Guillen sues army for 35 million

By Lateshia Beachum and Alex Horton

The family of Spec. Vanessa Guillén, the Fort Hood soldier who was sexually harassed, killed and dismembered while she served at the Texas base, has filed a wrongful death claim against the Army over “the nightmare she had to endure while serving,” her lawyer says.

According to a complaint filed Friday, Guillén’s family is seeking $35 million from the Department of the Army after she “suffered mental anguish, fear, emotional distress, physical injury, and death as a result of sexual harassment, rape, sodomy and physical assault” between Oct. 1, 2019, and April 22, 2020. The family is seeking $10 million for wrongful death and $25 million for personal injury claims two years after Guillén, 20, was killed by a fellow soldier, a slaying that helped press the Army to investigate how it handles missing members.

On April 22, 2020, Spec. Aaron Robinson fatally bludgeoned Guillén with a hammer at the Texas installation, investigators said. He then dismembered and buried her remains with the help of a girlfriend, Cecily Aguilar. The remains were discovered June 30, when investigators were zeroing in on Robinson as a suspect. He later shot himself when police tried to apprehend him in the neighboring town of Killeen. A federal grand jury indicted Aguilar on 11 charges, including conspiracy to tamper with documents or proceedings and three counts of accessory after the fact.

The Defense Department said in a statement Tuesday that “as a matter of policy the Department does not comment on pending litigation.”

Guillén’s killing ignited a slew of disciplinary actions and waves of protests calling for change in how the military handles claims of sexual assault. More than 20 soldiers, including a general and other officers, were punished, and some were suspended.

Army fires, suspends leaders after systemic failures at Fort Hood, officials say

The claim comes on the heels of the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that said the Feres doctrine, which bars military service members injured while on active duty from suing the federal government, does not cover sexual assault.

That court got it right, Natalie Khawam, the attorney for the Guillén family who filed last week’s claim, told The Washington Post.

“The Department of Defense has wrongfully applied Feres for years,” she said. “Any victim that has experienced sexual assault can now proceed with a case.”

In a statement attached to the claim, Guillén’s sister Mayra Guillén said she started noticing differences in her younger sister’s behavior in January 2020.

Guillén was less cheerful, more forlorn than her usual lively self, and she later confided to their mother about the sexual harassment and intimidation she said she was experiencing from higher-ups.

Mayra Guillén said her younger sister pleaded with their mother to not intervene because Guillén was fearful of retaliation for speaking out about the harassment, according to the court document.

Among the allegations in Mayra Guillén’s statement was that her sister’s superior had solicited her for sex in September 2019. Another soldier reported the alleged harassment of Guillén, leading to the retaliation she feared and prompting her suicidal ideation.

“The ARMY must be held accountable for their wrongdoings, the way they handled their investigations early on, the way that Vanessa was treated, the nightmare she had to endure while serving and only trying to serve her country and her family,” Mayra Guillén wrote. “Vanessa did not deserve to be sexually assaulted, to be murdered, to be cut up into pieces, to be burned, to be buried into cement.”

A 2021 Armyreport, and a complementarycivilian review in December 2020, found a permissive environment for sexual assault and harassment throughout the installation and within Guillén’s unit, the 3rd Cavalry Regiment.

For nearly a year, Army officials have said they had no evidence that Guillén faced sexual harassment, often denying the family’s specific allegations that Robinson had harassed her and refusing to address whether there were other potential abusers.

The report described two incidents in 2019 that disturbed Guillén, who didn’t officially report them because she feared retaliation. In one incident, a supervisor who was consistently hostile toward her made sexual remarks to her in Spanish.

It dismayed her so much, the report found, that another supervisor asked what was bothering her. She told the supervisor about the harassment and recounted it for other soldiers, some of whom then reported it to unit leadership, which did not address the problem.

The soldier who harassed her was not Robinson, but he did sexually harass another woman, investigators concluded.

Guillén’s killing and the attention it brought helped transform the way the Army considers and looks for missing soldiers. She was declared absent without leave, or AWOL, until the day her remains were discovered, despite it being clear that her disappearance was not voluntary, the report said. The designation was a matter of policy and didn’t affect the search effort, which the Army concluded was conducted well. The Army’s failure to detain Robinson helped him escape confinement and take his own life, and Guillén’s sister criticized its handling of the case.

‘A lack of responsibility’: How Vanessa Guillén’s killer fled a guard before taking his own life

The Army has since changed its policy to bring more urgency to finding soldiers and declaring them missing rather than absent, the report said, an attempt to remove the ambiguity of the status and the stigma of the AWOL label, which often implies that a soldier was unprofessional for not showing up to work.

The claim, Khawam said, aims to help Guillén’s family deal with the pain of their loss, although the anguish that has followed will never bring back what they want most — Guillén.

The Defense Department has six months to make a decision on the claim, she said.

“DOD never had that accountability,” she said of the recent court ruling and claim. “I believe the accountability we’re going to see is a lot of progression of law being put in place but also enforced.”

Image without a caption

By Lateshia BeachumLateshia Beachum is a general assignment reporter for The Washington Post. She previously worked for The Center for Public Integrity.  Twitter

Image without a caption

By Alex HortonAlex Horton is a national security reporter for The Washington Post focused on the U.S. military. He served in Iraq as an Army infantryman.  Twitter

Follow Us

More Post

Here at Khawam Ripka, we are passionate about helping heroes in the military get the attention and financial compensation they, and their families, deserve.

If you or someone you love has been a victim of military medical malpractice, we would be honored to represent them and their family in their claim.

Watch how Attorney Natalie Khawam fought for a decorated Green Beret

Play Video

Free Case Review

Share your experience and we will call you
If you were Active-duty within the last 2 years, we can help.

Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Your privacy is important to Khawam Ripka, LLP and its affiliated companies (hereinafter collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” “our” or “Khawam Ripka, LLP”). Because your privacy is our concern, we have developed this Privacy Policy to inform you about Khawam Ripka, LLP’s privacy practices. This Privacy Policy covers how we collect, use, disclose, transfer, and store your information. The examples in this Privacy Policy are illustrative only and are not intended to be exhaustive.

INFORMATION COLLECTED

We use the term “Personal Information” to mean any information that could reasonably be used to identify you, including your name, address, telephone number(s), driver’s license number, occupation, date of birth, social security number, personal or business tax identification numbers, legal information (such as judgment, liens, bankruptcies, etc.), credit history, and medical information (such as your health status and treatment history). The information we obtain depends on the context of your interactions with us. We may obtain such information directly from you on our website (the “Site”) or by telephone, and/or from applications, contracts, documents and forms you complete or sign. We may obtain additional information about you or, with your authorization, about others who may have an interest in your insurance or annuity policy, from your insurance or annuity company, insurance producer, health care providers, creditors, credit reporting agencies, and from your representatives or advisors. We may also obtain information about you from public records and, with your authorization, from other persons.

We use the term “Anonymous Information” to mean any information that does not identify you, and may include, for example, aggregated demographic information and statistical information concerning how you and other visitors use our website (the “Site”).

USE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION

We use the Personal Information you provide for purposes of the transactions or information that you request. As permitted by law, or as authorized by you, we may share your Personal Information with affiliated and non-affiliated companies that provide services related to information or transactions you request, under the following additional circumstances: (i) for us to establish or exercise our legal rights or to defend against legal claims; (ii) in connection with a proposed or actual sale, merger, transfer, exchange or consolidation of Khawam Ripka, LLP, an affiliated company or any portion thereof; (iii) to secure or obtain services and/or advice from our attorneys, accountants and auditors; and (iv) to permit our affiliates to contact you about products or services. We may also disclose your Personal Information to others for other purposes, with your authorization or otherwise as required or permitted by law.

Maintaining the accuracy of your information is a shared responsibility. We maintain the integrity of the information you provide us and will update your records when you notify us of a change. Please contact us at the address or phone number listed below when information concerning you changes.

USE OF ANONYMOUS INFORMATION

We may share Anonymous Information with our partners and resources.

FORMER CONTACTS OR INQUIRIES

We treat information obtained from past contacts and inquiries in the same manner we treat information that we obtain through current or future contacts or inquiries.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY

We restrict access to your Personal Information to our employees who need this information in connection with your current or future transaction(s) or to provide you information that you may request from us. We maintain electronic, procedural, and physical safeguards to guard your nonpublic information. We take precautions to protect your information, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage, is 100% secure. While the computers/servers in which we store your Personal Information are kept in a secure environment, we cannot guarantee absolute security.

UPDATES TO OUR PRIVACY POLICY

We reserve the right to change this privacy policy at any time. If our information practices change, we will post the changed policy to our website. These privacy principles do not constitute a contract, create legal rights, or supersede any preexisting agreements with clients.

“COOKIES”

We use “cookies” on this site. A cookie is a piece of data stored on a site visitor’s hard drive to help us improve your access to our site and identify repeat visitors to our site. For instance, when we use a cookie to identify you, you would not have to log in a password more than once, thereby saving time while on our site. Cookies can also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our site. Usage of a cookie is in no way linked to any personally identifiable information on our site. Note that your browser settings may allow you to automatically transmit a “Do Not Track” signal to websites and online services you visit. There is no consensus among industry participants as to what “Do Not Track” means in this context. Like many websites, Khawam Ripka, LLP currently does not alter its practices when it receives a “Do Not Track” signal from a visitor’s browser.

LINKING

Our Site may contain links to other affiliated websites. Because we do not control the content of websites linking to or from our Site, we are not responsible nor can we make representations regarding the content of those websites or their individual privacy policies. We encourage you to read the privacy policies of any website that links to or from our Site that collects personally identifiable information.