When Autonomous Surgical Systems Fail: The Legal Future of Robotic Malpractice in Military Hospitals – For the Military – Ripka LLP

When Autonomous Surgical Systems Fail: The Legal Future of Robotic Malpractice in Military Hospitals
When Autonomous Surgical Systems Fail- The Legal Future of Robotic Malpractice in Military Hospitals

Technology has changed the way the military approaches medicine. From battlefield trauma stabilization to remote tele-surgery, robotics and artificial intelligence have made medical care faster, more precise, and less invasive. But with these advancements comes a new legal frontier: what happens when autonomous surgical systems fail—and a service member, veteran, or dependent is injured as a result?

At Khawam Ripka LLP, we’re seeing a rise in malpractice claims involving robotic and AI-assisted procedures within the military healthcare system. These cases raise complex questions of liability, oversight, and accountability that traditional malpractice laws were never designed to answer. In this blog, we explore how robotic surgical errors occur, who can be held responsible, and what legal options exist under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for victims of these emerging medical failures.

Understanding the Role of Autonomous Surgical Systems in Military Medicine

Robotic surgical systems—such as the da Vinci® Surgical System—are increasingly used across Department of Defense (DoD) and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. These systems allow surgeons to operate through small incisions with enhanced precision and minimal recovery time.

However, newer systems are evolving toward partial or full autonomy, where machine learning algorithms assist or even make micro-decisions during procedures. This shift, while revolutionary, creates legal and ethical gray areas when something goes wrong.

Common Military Uses for Robotic Surgery Include:

  • Orthopedic and spinal procedures for service-related injuries 
  • Cardiothoracic and abdominal surgeries in VA hospitals 
  • Battlefield tele-surgery and remote triage support 
  • Minimally invasive treatments for veterans with chronic pain or mobility issues 

While these tools enhance care and efficiency, they also introduce mechanical risks, programming errors, and oversight failures that can lead to devastating outcomes.

When Robotic Surgery Goes Wrong

Autonomous or semi-autonomous systems depend on sensors, algorithms, and human oversight. If one component fails, the result can be catastrophic.

Examples of Robotic Surgery Malfunctions:

  • Mechanical failure — malfunctioning arms, broken instruments, or camera errors during surgery. 
  • Software glitches — incorrect algorithmic commands leading to unintended incisions or tissue damage. 
  • Data transmission errors — particularly in tele-surgical setups where connectivity loss disrupts real-time control. 
  • Insufficient supervision — human surgeons relying too heavily on automation, missing warning signals or alerts. 
  • Improper calibration or maintenance — leading to incorrect movements or response delays. 

Victims of these failures may suffer internal injuries, excessive bleeding, infections, nerve damage, or even death. What’s more, the complexity of these systems often makes it difficult to immediately identify what—or who—caused the error.

Determining Liability: Human Error or Machine Defect?

One of the biggest challenges in robotic malpractice cases is pinpointing liability. Is the surgeon to blame? The manufacturer? The government agency that deployed the device?

In civilian cases, product liability laws often allow injured patients to sue manufacturers for defects. But in military and VA settings, claims typically fall under federal jurisdiction through the FTCA.

Possible Liable Parties Include:

  • Military or VA medical staff for improper setup, calibration, or monitoring. 
  • The DoD or VA if they failed to maintain the device, ignored recall warnings, or used outdated software. 
  • Manufacturers or contractors if a hardware or software defect caused the injury. 

Because most military medical professionals are federal employees, claims against them must follow strict FTCA procedures—and cannot proceed like standard malpractice lawsuits.

The FTCA and Robotic Malpractice in Federal Hospitals

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) allows civilians, military retirees, veterans, and dependents to pursue compensation for injuries caused by negligence in federal facilities. However, these cases must meet specific legal criteria and procedural deadlines.

To File a Robotic Malpractice Claim Under the FTCA, You Must Prove:

  1. A Duty of Care Was Owed — The provider or hospital had a legal obligation to deliver competent medical care. 
  2. A Breach of Duty Occurred — The medical staff or facility acted negligently, such as failing to monitor the robotic system or ignoring error alerts. 
  3. Causation — The negligence directly caused your injury. 
  4. Damages — You suffered measurable harm—physical, financial, or emotional—as a result. 

In cases involving autonomous systems, establishing these elements may also require technical evidence such as:

  • Device logs and operating system data 
  • Maintenance and calibration records 
  • Manufacturer manuals and design specifications 
  • Expert analysis of AI decision-making algorithms 

These details help determine whether human oversight or machine malfunction caused the harm—and who bears responsibility.

The Legal Challenges of AI and Autonomy in Military Medicine

Traditional malpractice laws assume human control. But when algorithms make micro-decisions during surgery, the concept of negligence becomes blurred.

Key Legal Questions Include:

  • Can a machine itself be “negligent”? 
  • What level of oversight must a human surgeon maintain over autonomous systems? 
  • How is fault divided between human and machine when both contribute to an injury? 
  • Do military contractors share liability for defective AI systems deployed in federal hospitals? 

Currently, courts rely on expert testimony and forensic digital evidence to answer these questions. But as robotic systems become more autonomous, federal agencies and lawmakers will need to establish new legal standards for accountability.

Filing a Military Medical Malpractice Claim Involving Robotics

If you were injured by a robotic or AI-assisted procedure in a military or VA hospital, you may have a valid claim under the FTCA.

Steps to Begin the Process:

  1. File a Standard Form 95 (SF-95):
     Submit it to the appropriate federal agency (DoD or VA) within two years of discovering the injury. 
  2. Include Detailed Evidence:
     Provide a clear timeline, medical documentation, surgical reports, and—if possible—data from the robotic system involved. 
  3. Await Agency Review:
     The government has six months to investigate. If they deny or fail to respond, you can file in federal court. 
  4. Consult an Experienced Attorney:
     Robotic malpractice claims often require collaboration between medical experts, software engineers, and legal specialists. 

Potential Compensation for Robotic Malpractice

A successful FTCA claim may result in compensation for:

  • Medical expenses for corrective surgeries or rehabilitation 
  • Lost wages and diminished earning potential 
  • Pain, suffering, and emotional distress 
  • Long-term care for permanent injuries or disability 

While punitive damages are not available under the FTCA, settlements can still be substantial—especially in cases involving permanent loss or institutional negligence.

Conclusion: The Future of Accountability in Military Robotic Surgery

Autonomous surgical systems represent the future of military medicine—but they also represent a growing legal battleground. As AI and robotics take on greater roles in surgery, the line between human and machine responsibility is blurring. When that line leads to injury, victims deserve clarity, justice, and compensation.

At Khawam Ripka LLP, we help service members, veterans, and military families navigate complex malpractice cases involving robotic and AI-driven medical systems. Our firm combines legal precision with technical insight to uncover negligence—even in the most advanced systems.

📞 If you or a loved one suffered injury from a robotic surgery in a military or VA facility, contact us today or visit ForTheMilitary.com to schedule a confidential consultation.

Technology should save lives, not endanger them. When it fails, we’re here to hold the system accountable—and to help you reclaim your health, dignity, and future.

Follow Us

Linkedin Facebook-f Instagram Twitter

More Post

Here at Ripka LLP, we are passionate about helping heroes in the military get the attention and financial compensation they, and their families, deserve.

If you or someone you love has been a victim of military medical malpractice, we would be honored to represent them and their family in their claim.

CONTACT US

Watch how Attorney fought for a decorated Green Beret

Free Case Review

Share your experience and we will call you
If you were Active-duty within the last 2 years, we can help.

Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

Your privacy is important to Khawam Ripka, LLP and its affiliated companies (hereinafter collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” “our” or “Khawam Ripka, LLP”). Because your privacy is our concern, we have developed this Privacy Policy to inform you about Khawam Ripka, LLP’s privacy practices. This Privacy Policy covers how we collect, use, disclose, transfer, and store your information. The examples in this Privacy Policy are illustrative only and are not intended to be exhaustive.

INFORMATION COLLECTED

We use the term “Personal Information” to mean any information that could reasonably be used to identify you, including your name, address, telephone number(s), driver’s license number, occupation, date of birth, social security number, personal or business tax identification numbers, legal information (such as judgment, liens, bankruptcies, etc.), credit history, and medical information (such as your health status and treatment history). The information we obtain depends on the context of your interactions with us. We may obtain such information directly from you on our website (the “Site”) or by telephone, and/or from applications, contracts, documents and forms you complete or sign. We may obtain additional information about you or, with your authorization, about others who may have an interest in your insurance or annuity policy, from your insurance or annuity company, insurance producer, health care providers, creditors, credit reporting agencies, and from your representatives or advisors. We may also obtain information about you from public records and, with your authorization, from other persons.

We use the term “Anonymous Information” to mean any information that does not identify you, and may include, for example, aggregated demographic information and statistical information concerning how you and other visitors use our website (the “Site”).

USE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION

We use the Personal Information you provide for purposes of the transactions or information that you request. As permitted by law, or as authorized by you, we may share your Personal Information with affiliated and non-affiliated companies that provide services related to information or transactions you request, under the following additional circumstances: (i) for us to establish or exercise our legal rights or to defend against legal claims; (ii) in connection with a proposed or actual sale, merger, transfer, exchange or consolidation of Khawam Ripka, LLP, an affiliated company or any portion thereof; (iii) to secure or obtain services and/or advice from our attorneys, accountants and auditors; and (iv) to permit our affiliates to contact you about products or services. We may also disclose your Personal Information to others for other purposes, with your authorization or otherwise as required or permitted by law.

Maintaining the accuracy of your information is a shared responsibility. We maintain the integrity of the information you provide us and will update your records when you notify us of a change. Please contact us at the address or phone number listed below when information concerning you changes.

USE OF ANONYMOUS INFORMATION

We may share Anonymous Information with our partners and resources.

FORMER CONTACTS OR INQUIRIES

We treat information obtained from past contacts and inquiries in the same manner we treat information that we obtain through current or future contacts or inquiries.

CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY

We restrict access to your Personal Information to our employees who need this information in connection with your current or future transaction(s) or to provide you information that you may request from us. We maintain electronic, procedural, and physical safeguards to guard your nonpublic information. We take precautions to protect your information, but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet, or method of electronic storage, is 100% secure. While the computers/servers in which we store your Personal Information are kept in a secure environment, we cannot guarantee absolute security.

UPDATES TO OUR PRIVACY POLICY

We reserve the right to change this privacy policy at any time. If our information practices change, we will post the changed policy to our website. These privacy principles do not constitute a contract, create legal rights, or supersede any preexisting agreements with clients.

“COOKIES”

We use “cookies” on this site. A cookie is a piece of data stored on a site visitor’s hard drive to help us improve your access to our site and identify repeat visitors to our site. For instance, when we use a cookie to identify you, you would not have to log in a password more than once, thereby saving time while on our site. Cookies can also enable us to track and target the interests of our users to enhance the experience on our site. Usage of a cookie is in no way linked to any personally identifiable information on our site. Note that your browser settings may allow you to automatically transmit a “Do Not Track” signal to websites and online services you visit. There is no consensus among industry participants as to what “Do Not Track” means in this context. Like many websites, Khawam Ripka, LLP currently does not alter its practices when it receives a “Do Not Track” signal from a visitor’s browser.

LINKING

Our Site may contain links to other affiliated websites. Because we do not control the content of websites linking to or from our Site, we are not responsible nor can we make representations regarding the content of those websites or their individual privacy policies. We encourage you to read the privacy policies of any website that links to or from our Site that collects personally identifiable information.